Roderick Frazier
Nash’s Island Civilization: A Vision for
Human Occupancy of Earth in the Fourth Millennium highlights several key
events during the first three millenniums and how the fourth could turn
out. Humans developed their dominance
over the years and continue to assert it.
Overtime they separated themselves from nature and the wilderness. During the second millennium several laws
were passed that forced humans to reassess their dominant role in nature. They were forced to look at other life forms
as important. Today, we have progressed
into viewing the world as a something that needs to be taken care of.
After evaluating the
first three millenniums Nash continues to discuss the options for the fourth millennium. Nash does not want the world to turn into a ‘wasteland’
where everything is trashed. However, “humans
have proved to be terrible neighbors,” who tend to destroy all the resources
around them. Only “pathetic remnants” would
be able to live in a world as corrupt and polluted as the wasteland scenario
suggests. The world could also progress
into a ‘garden scenario’ where humans control all of nature and society become
anthropocentric. Humans technological
advances seem to become more controlling as they progress. People say the power and control humans currently
have over nature is dangerous. The third
scenario is the “future primitive” where humans would once again become “hunters
and gatherers.” Technology would not
become nonexistent but humans would have to learn how to use it in a more
responsible way according to Henry David Thoreau. In Nash’s “dream world” an Island Civilization
will occur in which humans will live on islands separate from the
environment. For this scenario to occur
the population will have to be eliminated down to 1.5 billion people, which is
about a quarter of the current population.
Reading Nash’s Island Civilization opened my eyes to
the world’s potential. The world could
develop in so many different ways by the fourth millennium and it is up to us
today to help it evolve. I do not see
Nash’s Island Civilization as a practical outcome but I do think humans are
trying to become more conservative. Therefore,
the world shouldn’t develop into a complete wasteland. Furthermore, I do not seeing humans as opting
for isolation on these islands he is proposing.
Technology is ever evolving which is why humans will not stop
improvements in technology so they can use it more wisely. Therefore, the most logical scenario seems to
be the garden scenario. The garden scenario
will let the humans have complete control and biodiversity will become extinct.
One part of the Island
Civilization scenario that would be most beneficial to the evolving planet
would be to cut our population. More
than one billion people are added to the earth every fifteen years. If we continue at this drastic rate there
will be no hope to conserve any parts of the Earth’s natural resources. Furthermore, I agree that we should learn to
use technology more wisely. We continue
to advance but we never assess the detrimental effects we could be causing to
the environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment